In Defense of Al Sharpton

Don Boudreaux writes to Al Sharpton:

Rev. Al Sharpton
National Action Network

Dear Rev. Sharpton:

Your organization, the National Action Network, e-mailed me to boast about your complaint to Walgreen’s CEO regarding his company’s alleged ‘underserving’ of minorities.

I like your tactic! But it prompts me to ask: Why are you ‘underserving’ minorities in need of low-priced pharmaceutical products?

What have you done to attract private capital to finance retail outlets? How have you helped to organize supply chains that get pharmaceuticals from factories to consumers at costs that make the on-going retail distribution of these products profitable at prices that also are affordable to low-income consumers? Where’s the evidence of your entrepreneurial creativity – and the evidence of you risking your own money and of you spending untold hours of your own time – to help bring pharmaceuticals to low-income neighborhoods? Why do you not devote more of your ample energies to struggle with details of the likes of inventory management, optimal liability-insurance coverage, and OSHA work-place-safety regulations so that you can create a retail pharmaceutical chain that earns sufficient profit to enable it to stay afloat while it simultaneously achieves all of what you somehow divine such a retail chain ‘should’ achieve?

Walgreen’s investors and employees actually and already contribute infinitely more energy and resources than you do to the process of making pharmaceutical products readily available to the masses. So surely if it’s appropriate – as you clearly believe it to be – to fling accusations at anyone who arguably exerts insufficient effort to improve the retail distribution of pharmaceutical products, you deserve far more criticism than does Walgreen’s and its CEO.

Donald J. Boudreaux

Here’s my comment (you have to go down to about the 100th comment):

John Donnelly    December 14, 2011 at 7:17 pm

Ok, I’ll be your huckleberry. I know that most of the commenters are your fanboys (and girls) so I will take the Sharpton side.

Professor Boudreaux is like a father in his disciplining of the complainer with the old argument, “if you aren’t part of the solution, you are part of the problem” or “what? are your legs broken”. His argument is likened to telling an art critic to “grab a brush”!

Unfortunately Professor Boudreaux is not helpful in this case simply because the good Reverend is not in the business of distributing pharmaceuticals and he needn’t be. Nor does Rev Sharpton need to be an economist to express his opinion about Walgreens and their distribution and pricing policies from his social utility point of view.

Chucklehead has it right, Sharpton is just doing his job, complaining on behalf of those he deems to need his help and who don’t enjoy his level of influence. Rev. Sharpton’s attempt to sway a large corporation to do (hopefully mutually beneficial) business to help his community is a very rational thing to do given his unique assets and abilities.

I can go on about the good Reverend’s assets and how he leverages them but that is another debate.

This should generate some interesting comments!


  1. For the life of me I cannot track down the email to Boudreaux from NAN. I will assume he had no reason to respond to nothing. The pharma rant is a bit of a puzzle. Because if a corporation has a reputation of hiring only part time help it would stand to reason they would have no medical benefits, HENCE, cheap prescriptions would be mandatory, if only to have them show up to work on time and healthy.

    But lets go deeper here, to the systematic attack on American life and the American dream, from the suggestion that child labor laws be taken down to the Walmart “company store” model being re-introduced into the societal grid. Here is how it works. You got to work at a mega store part time. You get a 40% discount on everything or graduated discount depending on the products. The company store has everything a family needs to survive. SURVIVE, not thrive, SURVIVE. So, the discount is in place and the employee can take what they need against their paycheck.

    Guess what happens when their paycheck arrives, they have little or no paycheck left, because they have been borrowing against it for food, clothing and medicine at the discounted rates offered due to their employment and the megastore employer will argue that due to their generous discounts the workers are actually truly blessed with full time employment. This is indentured servitude at its newest and most bogus invention. I mean really…Harvard, Stanford, Princeton, Yale…what a model. Minimum wage, a 40% discount and a part time job and in hock to the company megastore….slavery at it’s modern finest. God help us.

    As for why Boudreaux would expect Walmart workers to work a full day behind the register, make dinner, do homework with their children and then dress up and woo investors for Walmart pharma providers, I would challenge him to do the same. Get back to us on that. I know that Walmart workers could kick your *ss and not because of management, but because of their dedication as Americans and to their families.

  2. By the way, good stuff John. So glad you picked up on this. I hate the prevalence of robber baron models rearing their ugly heads these days. What was old is new again? This is what I believe is the unexplained aspects of the “Occupy…” movements. These models are so old they are not really taught so much anymore. Hence, the trap you walk into that was regulated for at one time and has now been de-reged and is now the perfect “new trap” that is really so old. “The Protester” cannot always articulate this stuff going on around them. They see it, feel it, know it and it is kicking them in the butt and they are trying to find the source of this nonsense and how it has hijacked there present life and future life. I hope I am making sense.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s